counts violation of the u2fifa

Commented.U.S. District judge Richard Seeborg dismissed all but one of the counts violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) brought against SCEA in February 2011, and said the plaintiffs had not sufficiently stated their claim. He let the CFAA claim, which argued SCEA "intentionally caused damage without authorization, to <b>FIFA 18 Coins</b> a protected computer" stand, finding the company had not "conclusively established that disabling a PS3 capability of the nature of the

OS feature is within the scope of the license agreement provisions on <b>FUT 18 Coins</b> which it relies."Seeborg added that Sony had not "shown that those plaintiffs who downloaded the Update thereby necessarily 'authorized' the removal of the feature within the meaning of the statute." For the dismissed counts, he allowed the plaintiffs a leave to amend their claims, which they did soon after.According to Courthouse News Service, though, the judge said last week that the plaintiffs failed to cure "the

identified deficiencies" in their amendments. He stated, "Because the facts alleged do not show wrongdoing even under the CFAA, the motion [to dismiss] will be granted."Seeborg did not give the plaintiffs the option to amend their claims again: "In light of the prior amendment, and the fundamental shortcomings in plaintiffs' basic theory that it was wrongful for Sony to release the software update in dispute, leave to amend will be denied.""[Almost] all of the counts are based on plaintiffs'

contention that it was wrongful for Sony to disable the Other OS feature, or, more precisely, to [force PS3 owners to decide between] permitting the Other OS feature to be disabled or forgoing their access to the PSN and any other benefits available through installing" the firmware.Continuing his statement on SCEA's perceived obligations, he added, "The flaw in plaintiffs' [argument] is that they are claiming rights not only with respect to the features of the PS3 product, but also to <b>u2fifa</b>